If you're in trouble and cannot find an answer to a question which goes beyond Stack Overflow...

If you have a not-so-usual solution for your problems but need to justify it to your boss...

If you like to think on your own rather than blindly follow "common wisdom" and "profound truth"...

...then 'No Bugs' Hare on Soft.ware might be the right place for you.

Your mileage may vary. Batteries not included

Assorted Rants Tagged ‘Determinism’, page 3:

Asynchronous Processing for Finite State Machines/Actors: from plain event processing to Futures (with OO and Lambda Call Pyramids in between)

posted January 11, 2016 by "No Bugs" Hare

Quote:	“With ‘callback pyramid’ it is not easy to express the concept of ‘wait for more than one thing to complete’ , which leads to unnecessary sequencing, adding to latencies (which may or may not be a problem for your purposes, but still a thing to keep in mind).”
Another Quote:	“Don’t even think of converting all of your code to a so-called Continuation-Passing-Style”
	[→]

posted December 14, 2015 by "No Bugs" Hare

Quote:	“To have a good concurrency model, it is not strictly necessary to program in Erlang”
Another Quote:	“Most of developers agree that FSM-based programming is beneficial in the medium- to long-run.”
	[→]

posted December 7, 2015 by "No Bugs" Hare

Quote:	“After your logic has failed in production, you can “replay” this inputs-log on your functionally identical in-house system, and the bug will be reproduced at the very same point where it has originally happened.”
Another Quote:	“You can implement your Finite State Machine as a deterministic variation of a usual event-driven program”
	[→]